PEP 568 – Generator-sensitivity for Context Variables
- Author:
- Nathaniel J. Smith <njs at pobox.com>
- Status:
- Deferred
- Type:
- Standards Track
- Created:
- 04-Jan-2018
- Python-Version:
- 3.8
- Post-History:
Abstract
Context variables provide a generic mechanism for tracking dynamic, context-local state, similar to thread-local storage but generalized to cope work with other kinds of thread-like contexts, such as asyncio Tasks. PEP 550 proposed a mechanism for context-local state that was also sensitive to generator context, but this was pretty complicated, so the BDFL requested it be simplified. The result was PEP 567, which is targeted for inclusion in 3.7. This PEP then extends PEP 567’s machinery to add generator context sensitivity.
This PEP is starting out in the “deferred” status, because there isn’t enough time to give it proper consideration before the 3.7 feature freeze. The only goal right now is to understand what would be required to add generator context sensitivity in 3.8, so that we can avoid shipping something in 3.7 that would rule it out by accident. (Ruling it out on purpose can wait until 3.8 ;-).)
Rationale
[Currently the point of this PEP is just to understand how this would work, with discussion of whether it’s a good idea deferred until after the 3.7 feature freeze. So rationale is TBD.]
High-level summary
Instead of holding a single Context
, the threadstate now holds a
ChainMap
of Context
s. ContextVar.get
and
ContextVar.set
are backed by the ChainMap
. Generators and
async generators each have an associated Context
that they push
onto the ChainMap
while they’re running to isolate their
context-local changes from their callers, though this can be
overridden in cases like @contextlib.contextmanager
where
“leaking” context changes from the generator into its caller is
desirable.
Specification
Review of PEP 567
Let’s start by reviewing how PEP 567 works, and then in the next section we’ll describe the differences.
In PEP 567, a Context
is a Mapping
from ContextVar
objects
to arbitrary values. In our pseudo-code here we’ll pretend that it
uses a dict
for backing storage. (The real implementation uses a
HAMT, which is semantically equivalent to a dict
but with
different performance trade-offs.):
class Context(collections.abc.Mapping):
def __init__(self):
self._data = {}
self._in_use = False
def __getitem__(self, key):
return self._data[key]
def __iter__(self):
return iter(self._data)
def __len__(self):
return len(self._data)
At any given moment, the threadstate holds a current Context
(initialized to an empty Context
when the threadstate is created);
we can use Context.run
to temporarily switch the current
Context
:
# Context.run
def run(self, fn, *args, **kwargs):
if self._in_use:
raise RuntimeError("Context already in use")
tstate = get_thread_state()
old_context = tstate.current_context
tstate.current_context = self
self._in_use = True
try:
return fn(*args, **kwargs)
finally:
state.current_context = old_context
self._in_use = False
We can fetch a shallow copy of the current Context
by calling
copy_context
; this is commonly used when spawning a new task, so
that the child task can inherit context from its parent:
def copy_context():
tstate = get_thread_state()
new_context = Context()
new_context._data = dict(tstate.current_context)
return new_context
In practice, what end users generally work with is ContextVar
objects, which also provide the only way to mutate a Context
. They
work with a utility class Token
, which can be used to restore a
ContextVar
to its previous value:
class Token:
MISSING = sentinel_value()
# Note: constructor is private
def __init__(self, context, var, old_value):
self._context = context
self.var = var
self.old_value = old_value
# XX: PEP 567 currently makes this a method on ContextVar, but
# I'm going to propose it switch to this API because it's simpler.
def reset(self):
# XX: should we allow token reuse?
# XX: should we allow tokens to be used if the saved
# context is no longer active?
if self.old_value is self.MISSING:
del self._context._data[self.context_var]
else:
self._context._data[self.context_var] = self.old_value
# XX: the handling of defaults here uses the simplified proposal from
# https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-January/151596.html
# This can be updated to whatever we settle on, it was just less
# typing this way :-)
class ContextVar:
def __init__(self, name, *, default=None):
self.name = name
self.default = default
def get(self):
context = get_thread_state().current_context
return context.get(self, self.default)
def set(self, new_value):
context = get_thread_state().current_context
token = Token(context, self, context.get(self, Token.MISSING))
context._data[self] = new_value
return token
Changes from PEP 567 to this PEP
In general, Context
remains the same. However, now instead of
holding a single Context
object, the threadstate stores a stack of
them. This stack acts just like a collections.ChainMap
, so we’ll
use that in our pseudocode. Context.run
then becomes:
# Context.run
def run(self, fn, *args, **kwargs):
if self._in_use:
raise RuntimeError("Context already in use")
tstate = get_thread_state()
old_context_stack = tstate.current_context_stack
tstate.current_context_stack = ChainMap([self]) # changed
self._in_use = True
try:
return fn(*args, **kwargs)
finally:
state.current_context_stack = old_context_stack
self._in_use = False
Aside from some updated variables names (e.g.,
tstate.current_context
→ tstate.current_context_stack
), the
only change here is on the marked line, which now wraps the context in
a ChainMap
before stashing it in the threadstate.
We also add a Context.push
method, which is almost exactly like
Context.run
, except that it temporarily pushes the Context
onto the existing stack, instead of temporarily replacing the whole
stack:
# Context.push
def push(self, fn, *args, **kwargs):
if self._in_use:
raise RuntimeError("Context already in use")
tstate = get_thread_state()
tstate.current_context_stack.maps.insert(0, self) # different from run
self._in_use = True
try:
return fn(*args, **kwargs)
finally:
tstate.current_context_stack.maps.pop(0) # different from run
self._in_use = False
In most cases, we don’t expect push
to be used directly; instead,
it will be used implicitly by generators. Specifically, every
generator object and async generator object gains a new attribute
.context
. When an (async) generator object is created, this
attribute is initialized to an empty Context
(self.context =
Context()
). This is a mutable attribute; it can be changed by user
code. But trying to set it to anything that isn’t a Context
object
or None
will raise an error.
Whenever we enter an generator via __next__
, send
, throw
,
or close
, or enter an async generator by calling one of those
methods on its __anext__
, asend
, athrow
, or aclose
coroutines, then its .context
attribute is checked, and if
non-None
, is automatically pushed:
# GeneratorType.__next__
def __next__(self):
if self.context is not None:
return self.context.push(self.__real_next__)
else:
return self.__real_next__()
While we don’t expect people to use Context.push
often, making it
a public API preserves the principle that a generator can always be
rewritten as an explicit iterator class with equivalent semantics.
Also, we modify contextlib.(async)contextmanager
to always set its
(async) generator objects’ .context
attribute to None
:
# contextlib._GeneratorContextManagerBase.__init__
def __init__(self, func, args, kwds):
self.gen = func(*args, **kwds)
self.gen.context = None # added
...
This makes sure that code like this continues to work as expected:
@contextmanager
def decimal_precision(prec):
with decimal.localcontext() as ctx:
ctx.prec = prec
yield
with decimal_precision(2):
...
The general idea here is that by default, every generator object gets its own local context, but if users want to explicitly get some other behavior then they can do that.
Otherwise, things mostly work as before, except that we go through and
swap everything to use the threadstate ChainMap
instead of the
threadstate Context
. In full detail:
The copy_context
function now returns a flattened copy of the
“effective” context. (As an optimization, the implementation might
choose to do this flattening lazily, but if so this will be made
invisible to the user.) Compared to our previous implementation above,
the only change here is that tstate.current_context
has been
replaced with tstate.current_context_stack
:
def copy_context() -> Context:
tstate = get_thread_state()
new_context = Context()
new_context._data = dict(tstate.current_context_stack)
return new_context
Token
is unchanged, and the changes to ContextVar.get
are
trivial:
# ContextVar.get
def get(self):
context_stack = get_thread_state().current_context_stack
return context_stack.get(self, self.default)
ContextVar.set
is a little more interesting: instead of going
through the ChainMap
machinery like everything else, it always
mutates the top Context
in the stack, and – crucially! – sets up
the returned Token
to restore its state later. This allows us to
avoid accidentally “promoting” values between different levels in the
stack, as would happen if we did old = var.get(); ...;
var.set(old)
:
# ContextVar.set
def set(self, new_value):
top_context = get_thread_state().current_context_stack.maps[0]
token = Token(top_context, self, top_context.get(self, Token.MISSING))
top_context._data[self] = new_value
return token
And finally, to allow for introspection of the full context stack, we
provide a new function contextvars.get_context_stack
:
def get_context_stack() -> List[Context]:
return list(get_thread_state().current_context_stack.maps)
That’s all.
Comparison to PEP 550
The main difference from PEP 550 is that it reified what we’re calling
“contexts” and “context stacks” as two different concrete types
(LocalContext
and ExecutionContext
respectively). This led to
lots of confusion about what the differences were, and which object
should be used in which places. This proposal simplifies things by
only reifying the Context
, which is “just a dict”, and makes the
“context stack” an unnamed feature of the interpreter’s runtime state
– though it is still possible to introspect it using
get_context_stack
, for debugging and other purposes.
Implementation notes
Context
will continue to use a HAMT-based mapping structure under
the hood instead of dict
, since we expect that calls to
copy_context
are much more common than ContextVar.set
. In
almost all cases, copy_context
will find that there’s only one
Context
in the stack (because it’s rare for generators to spawn
new tasks), and can simply re-use it directly; in other cases HAMTs
are cheap to merge and this can be done lazily.
Rather than using an actual ChainMap
object, we’ll represent the
context stack using some appropriate structure – the most appropriate
options are probably either a bare list
with the “top” of the
stack being the end of the list so we can use push
/pop
, or
else an intrusive linked list (PyThreadState
→ Context
→
Context
→ …), with the “top” of the stack at the beginning of
the list to allow efficient push/pop.
A critical optimization in PEP 567 is the caching of values inside
ContextVar
. Switching from a single context to a context stack
makes this a little bit more complicated, but not too much. Currently,
we invalidate the cache whenever the threadstate’s current Context
changes (on thread switch, and when entering/exiting Context.run
).
The simplest approach here would be to invalidate the cache whenever
stack changes (on thread switch, when entering/exiting
Context.run
, and when entering/leaving Context.push
). The main
effect of this is that iterating a generator will invalidate the
cache. It seems unlikely that this will cause serious problems, but if
it does, then I think it can be avoided with a cleverer cache key that
recognizes that pushing and then popping a Context
returns the
threadstate to its previous state. (Idea: store the cache key for a
particular stack configuration in the topmost Context
.)
It seems unavoidable in this design that uncached get
will be
O(n), where n is the size of the context stack. However, n will
generally be very small – it’s roughly the number of nested
generators, so usually n=1, and it will be extremely rare to see n
greater than, say, 5. At worst, n is bounded by the recursion limit.
In addition, we can expect that in most cases of deep generator
recursion, most of the Context
s in the stack will be empty, and
thus can be skipped extremely quickly during lookup. And for repeated
lookups the caching mechanism will kick in. So it’s probably possible
to construct some extreme case where this causes performance problems,
but ordinary code should be essentially unaffected.
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/pep-0568.rst
Last modified: 2022-01-21 11:03:51 GMT